JNU stir: Why ‘anti-nationalism’ is an empty abuse that has no place in a free society
February 17, 2016 SA Aiyar in Swaminomics India Economic Times
Some highlights of this article
"Patriotism
is the last refuge of the scoundrel. The current rant against
‘anti-national’ slogans at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU)
highlights the abundance of scoundrels among Indian politicians and
television anchors. The notion that there can be only one concept of
what constitutes a nation, and that every other view is
anti-national, is intellectually empty at best and authoritarian at
worst."
" In
all free societies, students have espoused all sorts of extreme
positions, and must be free to do so. That is why they are called
free societies."
"
Their
right to dissent was not questioned even by those who condemned their
views.
Oxford
University is very establishment. But in 1933, the Oxford Union held
a famous debate on the motion, ‘This house will in no circumstances
fight for its King and country.’ The Union voted for the motion by
275 votes to 153. This ‘Oxford Pledge’ was later adopted by
students at the universities of Manchester and Glasgow. This sent
shock waves through Britain. The students were denounced as morons,
cowards, anti-nationals and communist sympathisers.
But
none dreamed of arresting the students for sedition. That puts in
perspective the authoritarian interpretation of sedition by the NDA
government. Worse is the ranting of media stars who ask in outrage
how any student dare call for the break-up of India. They seem
singularly ignorant of what a free society means."
"India’s
sedition law has been misused grossly for jailing a Tamil folk
singer, sundry cartoonists, demonstrators against the Kudankulam
power station, and even some people who simply ‘liked’ a Facebook
post.
To
me, these are all anti-national acts for which those in power should
be held accountable. I reject the anti-national definition of the
government."
No comments:
Post a Comment